-
Imagen del icono de la aplicación Gemini.
Talk to Gemini in an application.
Already available on Google Play.

Discussion with Gemini

You help me to better draft a text

Of course I do! I'm happy to help you polish it and leave it impeccable.

Please share your text here and tell me if you have any particular preference:

  • What tone are you looking for? (e.g. formal, professional, close, persuasive, academic)

  • What is the target or the public? (e.g. a customer mail, a network publication, a report, a letter of submission)

As soon as you send it to me, I get to work on it.

Dear cominity of ecclesial

Today I address you to give my personal opinion, as we all know several communities are living a wave of new players with chili and Argentina predating the arrival of their new players, but we are currently being attacked by the coalicion that was created to preserve the well-being of nations, or well that says their title.

And they are taking care of abusing unprotected countries as they know that a side of playing and attacking the countries that were drifting, and taking advantage of abusing new communities to leave the game, as they eliminate them and let the new players not grow and the game is not attractive to them.

When Poland had its Babyboom, the other countries let their players develop in post of the benefit of the game, which they do not currently do with the other communities.


Will the wolf be pacifist disguised as sheep?

Here is a proposal written with greater clarity, fluidity and orthographic correction, keeping the message and firmness of your argument intact:

Dear community of ecclesial:

Today I address you to share my personal opinion. As we all know, several communities are living a wave of new players; in fact, Chile and Argentina have recently witnessed the arrival of this new flow. However, we are currently being attacked by the coalition that was created, supposedly, to "preserve the well-being of nations" (or at least that says its name).

Instead of protecting, they are taking care of the defenceless countries. They take advantage of the fact that a side stopped playing to attack the nations that were left in the drifting, hating the new communities to abandon the game. By eliminating newcomers, they prevent them from growing and make the experience lose all its appeal.

When Poland had its babyboo m, the rest of the countries allowed their players to develop for the benefit of the game; something they are not willing to do for the other communities today.

Will it be Pacifist The wolf disguised as a sheep?

Main changes:

  • Spelling and typing: They corrected words like cominity, Church (the name of the game / community was maintained), direct, predatoryand missing tyls were added (opinion, are, Poland, Is it?).

  • Score and structure: Long ideas were separated in paragraphs to facilitate reading and impact more with the final message.

  • Editor: Sticked phrases like "a side of playing" by "one side stopped playing" to give the text cohesion.

You can translate this into English.

Standard / Direct Tone

Dear Eclesear community, Today I am writing to you to share my personal opinion. As we all know, several communities are experiencing a wave of new players; in fact, Chile and Argentina have recently witnessed the arrival of these new players. However, we are currently being attacked by the coalition that was created to Supposedly 'preserve the welfare of nations' - or at least, that is what its title claims. Instead of protecting, they are abusing defence countries. Taking advantage of the fact that one side stopped playing, they are attacking the nations that were left adrift, preying on new communities so that they abandon the game. By eliminating these new players, they prevent them from growing, making the game unattractive for them. When Poland had its baby boom, the other countries allowed its players to develop for the benefit of the game; something that they are currently refusing to do for the other communities. Is Pacifist a wolf in sheep's clothing?