COMMON RESISTANCE

WE FIGHT FOR REVOLUTION

WW7 AND THE UNION OF THE PROLETARIAT

In the midst of war and economic instability, one question remains: how long will the working class remain divided?

The WW7 put Ecclesiar back in the face of a big dispute between blocks.

But war doesn't happen alone.

The world economy is experiencing a period of weak growth, uncertainty, trade tensions and financial risks. The ILO also points to persistent problems of inequality and quality of employment.

For us Marxist-Leninists, this raises a fundamental question:

If the system is suddenly in crisis, why are the workers still fighting among themselves?

CRISIS IS NOT ONLY ACIDENT

In Marxist tradition, economic crises are analyzed as phenomena linked to the very contradictions of capitalism.

Production is socially performed by millions of workers.

But ownership and control of the means of production remain concentrated.

It is from this contradiction that a question arises:

IF WE PRODUCED COLLECTIVELY, WHY IS RICH NOT COLLECTIVELY CONTROLD?

WW7 SHOWS DANGER OF DIVISION

While Bakers and Passifist dispute territories, workers from different countries may end up seeing each other as opponents.

But for Marxism-Leninism, there is a fundamental distinction:

workers have interests that cross borders.

The Brazilian worker, Korean worker, Argentine worker or any other worker may be subjected to different conditions, but they are all part of a reality in which their work participates in the production of wealth.

War can divide people.

Class struggle can reveal what they have in common.

WHO PAYS WHEN THE SYSTEM COMES INTO CRISIS?

When there is economic instability, its effects are not distributed equally.

The ILO recorded a fall in the share of overall income for work between 2014 and 2024, while the IMF points to risks related to trade tensions, uncertainty and financial fragility.

So we ask:

Who has the resources to go through a crisis?

Who has the means of production?

And who depends on their own work to survive?

This difference is central to a Marxist analysis.

THE UNION OF THE PROLETARIAT

That is precisely why we defend the union of the working class.

It does not mean that all workers have exactly the same interests in all situations.

It means recognizing that the division between workers can prevent them from understanding their common position before economic structures.

The bourgeoisie has its interests.

The proletariat must also recognize its own.

WHAT DOES WW7 TEACH BRAZIL?

War shows us that states can mobilize enormous forces when they have a goal.

Then we should ask:

Why should the working class not also be politically organized to defend their own interests?

For us, the answer goes through awareness, organization, class solidarity and political participation.

The union of the proletariat does not mean abandoning the differences between the workers.

It means understanding that no single worker has the same strength as an organized class.

The WW7 can share ECLESIAR.

The working class doesn't have to remain divided.

The war can end.

The crisis can pass.

The territories can change hands.

But economic contradictions will continue to be discussed.

Therefore, our task is to understand the present and organize the future.

ECLESIAR WORKERS, UNI-YOU.

COMMON RESISTANCE

WE FIGHT FOR REVOLUTION