COMMON RESISTANCE
WE FIGHT FOR REVOLUTION
BAKERS OR PASSIFIST? BUT WHO WINS VICTORY?
The WW7 put Ecclesiar before two large blocks. But besides who wins the war, there is a question few are asking: who will really benefit from this victory?
TWO BLOCKS, A WAR
On one side, The Bakers.
On the other, Passifist.
The WW7 has already transformed Ecclesiar's balance of power and placed territories, alliances and influence in dispute.
But reduce the war to “Bakers or Passifist?” It's just looking at the surface.
For us, the most important question is:
WHO WINS WHEN A BLOCK WINS?
A victory can mean new territories, resources and influence.
But territory isn't just territory.
It's economic power.
It's political power.
It's production capacity.
It's an influence on Ecclesiar's future.
Therefore, a Marxist-Leninist analysis needs to look beyond borders.
It's not enough to ask who conquered the land.
We need to ask:
WHO'S GONNA CONTROL IT?
WHO WORKS WITH RICHNESS?
Imagine that one of the blocks ends the WW7 with huge territorial gains.
The economy grows.
New lands are occupied.
New resources are exploited.
But who gets the benefits?
The workers?
The businessmen?
The state?
The groups that already have capital?
For us, this is a fundamental issue.
A larger economy does not automatically mean a more egalitarian society.
If wealth grows, but remains concentrated, military victory may eventually strengthen just those who already have greater economic power.
BAKERS OR PASSIFIST IS NOT THE ONLY QUESTION
A Communist Resistance does not intend to analyze the WW7 just by choosing a flag.
Our perspective is Marxist-Leninist.
So we ask:
Who has the means of production?
Who controls the conquered territories?
Who controls the resources?
Who decides how wealth will be used?
What will be the role of workers after the war?
These questions are more important than simply knowing which army will occupy more territory.
What about BRAZIL?
Brazil is inside Passifist.
Therefore, a victory of the bloc could also mean territorial and economic gains for the country.
But again we need to ask:
If Brasil wins, who will win with him?
If new lands mean economic opportunities, we need to know who will have access to them.
If the economy grows, we need to know Who will control this wealth.
If Brazil becomes more powerful, we need to ask:
WILL THAT POWER BE IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE OR OF A MINORIA?
THE TRUE DISPUTE
Maybe the biggest WW7 dispute isn't just between Bakers and Passifist.
Maybe it's between different projects for the future of Ecclesiar.
A project can simply reorganize borders.
Another can reorganize alliances.
But a truly profound transformation would require questioning the very economic and political relations that determine who has power.
That's where the class struggle comes in.
WHO WILL WIN TRUTH?
When the war is over, there will be a military winner.
But that does not mean that we will have an answer to the social question.
Because we may have:
a military winner.
a new map.
a bigger economy.
New territories.
And yet have:
workers with no power.
concentrated wealth.
inequality.
decisions in the hands of the few.
So for us:
THE TRUE VICTORY IS NOT ONLY TERRITORIES. IT IS TO TRANSFORM WHO POWER.
After WW7
Bakers or Passifist?
That is the question that dominates Ecclesiar.
But we do another:
WHO WINS VICTORY?
Because when the guns shut up and the map is drawn again, someone will control the land.
Someone will control the resources.
Someone will control the economy.
Someone will make the decisions.
AND IT IS IN THIS MOMENT THAT CLASSES' FIGHT WILL GO BACK TO THE CENTER OF HISTORY.
The WW7 may decide who wins the war.
But you won't decide for yourself who should control the future.
